I know he looks like sort of a wise catfish or some creature monster from "big man, japan." What he lacks in magnetism he makes up with humorous critical thought.
He has a stereotypical asian-american deep voice and his speech has a slow tempo to it.
He's sort of a douche too. Once he wrote a post called "FUCK YOU JEREME!" on Htmlg because I said some shit that made him angry.
So my guess is he beats women. Kind of an overreactor.
I think i'm fucking this up. Check it:
(maybe he can get a sympathy blowjob at the next awp. i'm just saying everyone is already fucking everyone else anyways. just seems fair.)
single? didnt he just get married?
ReplyDeletethere you go. two plus two equals you.
ReplyDelete"Wise catfish." Love that.
ReplyDeletehttp://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/d7/unsecured/media/429149625/429149625_22034528001_asset-1241453799713.jpg?pubId=429149625
ReplyDelete^^^not spam.
ReplyDeletenot sure how this even remotely relates to literature or art or even culture at large...
ReplyDeletei thought jimmy was a writer?
ReplyDeleteWait for tomorrows post barry.
ReplyDeletehaha. gena. there are lots of writers. if stephen king is married and shit in a public toilet and got his asshole licked by ten male hookers on a tuesday in nova scotia, is it literary discourse?
ReplyDeletebarry. you seem uptight. have you and peter been watching too much lifetime lately?
ReplyDeleteno. when we get naked and watch lifetime we rub each other down with scented oils then everything is right with the world. maybe its a lack thereof?
ReplyDeleteive just been having a really fucked up week. sorry.
jereme:
ReplyDeleteall im saying is. im not sure what the point of this post is? to shit talk jimmy? he is a friend and a contributor to dogzplot and a talented writer. i understand you feel he has disrepected and shit talked you in the past. im not denying that. but i dont want our blog to be a place to handle petty beefs. please just stick to posting things that have merit to something artistic, in any way, however remotely. we're not censoring posts or deying people the right to say whatever they want. but this just seems like a waste of space. i thought we were all on board with that...
lol @ Lifetime, Gena. Jimmy's actually pretty cute, and EVERYONE knows that only cute guys can write half a damn. There's your relevance.
ReplyDeleteBarry you are really not getting my sarcasm. Jimmy dave me his permission. Where do you think I got the pic?
ReplyDeleteRemember I love you tomorrow.
cool. sorry to be a douche.
ReplyDeleteI get pics by using that handy "copy" feature, had no idea such use implied cahoots.
ReplyDeleteBarry should not have questioned in the face of such evidence.
He's clearly unfit. Who votes to throw shit at him?
I wish this Jereme guy would post some of his poetry. I'd like to read that!
ReplyDeletei'm just gonna throw shit at myself. starting with this bag of jolly ranchers beside the desk. if any of the grape ones hit me, im gonna get fucked up and watch tv forever.
ReplyDeleteI have some poetry just for you peter. But for now, I'm gonna go get fucked up with fist bauman. See you tomorrow boy with the ambrosia smile!
ReplyDeleteBarry just so you know I was kidding around, in all seriousness I don't get too involved in these things.
ReplyDeleteI don't even care enough to talk smack in the first place but you know, I was trying to participate.
I apologize for being snarky about the whole "picture is proof" thing. My feathers were just ruffled by the philosophy discussion, I guess.
ha. im just playing lynn. dont take anything i say seriously. just know i mean what i say... most of the time...
ReplyDeletei like snarky...
why does philosophy ruffle your feathers? im curious?
Well it's like this, Barry. I don't like when people assume ignorance on the part of others on a topic. I thought I detected a condescending scenario earlier in a different post and so I am admitting that my composure was already afoul and it tainted my comment here.
ReplyDeletePhilosophy itself does not ruffle my feathers, I read quite a bit. It is difficult though to engage people who are interested in an actual discussion though.
Why do you suppose that is?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletelynn i have no idea what you're saying. its easier just say what you mean instead of making references that nobody gets. what scenario? what post?
ReplyDeletejust because people post on a blog doesnt mean they are engaging in a discussion. maybe that isnt their intention, i dont know. maybe it is. its easier to just ask people if they wanna have a discussion and then discuss, instead of not asking and misunderstanding other peoples words and intentions.
Yeah, I hear you Barry. Gotcha.
ReplyDeleteGood advice.
yes and yes
ReplyDeletejeremy and i are friends now, this post was meant to be endearing. our relationship, like all romantic comedies, started off rocky but is know littered with rose petals. he's just trying to be my pimp.
ReplyDeletelynn, i'll participate in this question:
ReplyDeleteIt is difficult though to engage people who are interested in an actual discussion though.
Why do you suppose that is?